Heidegger's Contributions to Philosophy on enowning explained.

: this isHOWTO READ THIS Nazi writer MORALLY cause HE DID!get the drop on life not being just EMPTY SPACE folks.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

by The Editor

Contemplating Martin Heidegger's Contributions to Philosophy, on EN-own\ING.\\\\

Anyways, enowning, what is it, what's it got; and how do I GET it my hat for HARVARD's centennial celebration of diversity of NAZI interlocutors(cause people seem to think the totality of Martin's RESUME is a dropped nazi-pinNEEDLE for moronsz to work a satellite surveilance system like they are the smartest in history and MARTIN wasn't a FARMer).....\\\.

Well, first: to "en"means to get it",some thing!. then to \OWN\? meant, in his 2-page preview(basically the recapitulation of the whole work! which, if you are the smartest PHENOMenO logic al interpreter in history, you can read in lieu of the rest of it) ta have possession of the thing(as a BEING-in-theWORLD, with that 'thing' in Martin's parlance:::::KNOWLEDGEabLY, "ready-at-hand"). This is where it ends cause the truth of ALL LIFE IS that this is EVEN the mission on HISTORICAL significances.

In any case to clarify a few of the STRANGE DESCRIPTIONS in this preview(and what he telegraphs, and from what anyone reads HEIDEGGER knows is coming), all the bizarre kinds of INSECT-life EVOCATIONS:::::::::LOSERS: you! know what (en]quivering means it means to have solved A problem and [then) become! practical in one's orientation, surveying the win!they've managed through the thought of their being-in-the life they now lead which is the end...//////WAVERING then.....the, strange way///.....a simple SOUL .... ////////gets blown about by the winds of history.................[and, so, now a reader knows WHOW TO understand the objectivity of MARTIN's position!in this book and thereby how to further read into his work the MORAL dimension of theat which MUST limitate!thought in order to RENDER such phenomenologicalitiesz as anything at all when they depict! a scene so strange it is HARDto SURMOUNT THE IDEA thaet it is simple UNDERGROWTH wherefore his mission, though is the liberation of the human***** condition from its DISPOSSESSION from these historical falsities of which the present suffers dearly under these 'scholars' tyranny of life in their mealy-mouth moronical fooler which HIEDEGGER would never have taken an interest in no matter how 'liberatory' these assholes think they get and they are fuckin' WANKER LEVEL deadly(which is not accomplisheable(as he warns in Division 2 of Being and Time as a being-a-whole of one and then all-together, which is TOTALITARIAN.)].

--SO:!!!!!THANKS TO martin!heidegger for the interesting work that COULD BE TAUGHT as only a guidance on how to think about existential problems as if they were morally phenomenological and surveying this bleak domain!were necessary at all rather thaen SIMPLY litigating the issues as if they MATTERED(which is the real reason not to teach it at. All.)\

BUT: this is the total combination as a moral-problematical, of this first division!of this book, Contribution!to PHILO.

Historical-Exposition of the excludedness of Being as existABLE according to its ownmost proper* WAY! of being(as. it. STANDS).which is at both once edifyingly SOCIAL and incommensurably indivisible.\\\\\.

More Cinematicity