And WHY hitlerite people SHOULD NEVER contemplate USING-cinema to achieve any social-purpose.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

SO, the point here, is to wonder about WHETHER OR NOT RICHARD LINKLATER::::scheduledDELPHIES.LOOK.correctly and whether or NOT:european LEADERS HAVE ASSESSD their 'train-mentality"properly and correctly with regard to the INCREASING DISTANCESPERSONSOFINTEREST,travel,these days*in the EUROPEAN continent. AND WHETHER we say "on the continent"versus "inthe continent"does pre-figure alot of the discussion, actually, BECAUSE, for a start:::in the original Before Sunrise, Ethan is ain't ININ it, whereas, today, for certain——a person would be ON IT as within-a-novel-context. Getting LANDED, however(which IS*how a person WAS, formerly, much simplerly ABLE TO simple BECOME part of the MOVING imagery, all around them(which is an AURA, actually, upon which a person STANDS……..}is by travelling to an FOREIGN destination……

In any case, the way in which this pertains on DELPY's look? In the early 1990s, immersed within THEIR*, life-world, one, such as JESSIE, would have "come across" other women mired in their situationalitysz. NATURAL and since she is a POLISH?NO: american tourist in this movie, such that it is BASICALLY impossible to sus-out whether she is there dressed properly or notNOT!because in her laisseeé, lies the conformity of her version to what we are(ibid.(; discussed already which is that TRAVELLING europe was more fundamentally an uncharted thing. And, so:she comes across as essentially that kind of ordinary-but-also-familiarlyUPFORsomething which IS!how a person in EUROPE would NOT have appeared even then.

And, yet::::10-years later or so::::she IS!dressed as an EU-citizen now, and DOES reflect the proper type of girl a person would encounter in thaet area, which is essentially the encounter with ideology itself, as reformatting the essential-truth of ordinary-life standard. WHICH IS also to say the scene in the initial-CAFE makes a bit more sense to be seated so closely because it is the type of thing::::IDEOLOGY will punctuate, in order to speak its sentence(about being in EUROPE…….Cause, what somebody*(i.e., a nobody probably(cause it is NOTlinklater unless you're stupid)has written on the back of the DVD-jewlecase about the 'adventures of the heart'))))); is very much what we are aiming-for here in the form of the simple question:"Is the "DELPHIE"(of 2004) the correct date for ETHAN and DELPYif they were in love at thaet time.?" NO: "is it the CORRECT presentation of these people SHOULD ONE WANT TO DEPICT the continuation of ArealACTUALlove-affair?

And this is, again: to essentially query the past for its AUTHENTICITY(and, likewise, the present of 2004 and yet even today still for the AUTHENTICALLY anti-BOURGEOI . And, the reason this is the search is BECAUSE of the simple FACT thaet ETHAN is an AVATAR of a super-ordinary form of AMERICAN AUTHENTCITY anybody knows about in thaet country even if it is dogsledSHIT, today. On this FARHADIAN, premise, we might establish(1)she COULD NOT HAVE APPEARED american;I would venture PUNK/skater/or otherwise ALTERNATIVE anniFRANCOtype(there IS SIMPLY NO WAY the EUROPEAN context is THAT FAMILIAR in 1994 is the SERIOUS axiomatical claim .).;2.:the dillemma-facingISSUE now is thaet ONLY couples thaet consummated a love-life at all from without of the similar condition in which ETHAN HAWKE himself DWELLED in that time-periodWOULD BE EXAMPLARY or MANIFESTATIONSz-thereofandBY/. And since he dated a trashy movie star the second(movie(: is about how fuckin' LAME she was as a kickassBITCH(i.e., UMA thurman.) there's not much to go on unless someone SURVEYS academical-culture for RESULTS of this query. THEbelief isTHAT it is STANDARD issue BOURGEOIS in this case, otherwise it is SERIOUSLY fringe? VEGAN on steroids by 2004? The simple truth is THIS KIND OF relationship never happens between people thaet go anywhere on this earth it is a DREAM of sorts thaet cannot but EITHER,A) itself reform the entire GLOBE and thereby MAKE US ALL AWARE OF ENTIRELY NEW LIVING CONDITIONS which ETHAN didNOTdo(at this POINT THIS SCRIPT IS prima-facie read from REALITY which I ALSO KNOW personally as my own trash life with a AMNESTY whore!(for anyone I think HawkeHIS, book is NOT THAT FOR ANYONE ACTUALLY.) or B:exempt people from the ordinary bustle of academical standards thereby manufacting::::a novel enterprise between social-souls which can OUTCOME like before SUNrisedid but NOT:Before sunSET because in the latter it is only the JUDGE OF THE JURY thaet remains for LINKLATER TO PRESENT his case WITH, which is to say he NEEDS A ROMANCE for the TOPIC-duJURE, which is POLITICAL activistical-relating as MARXISTS(which is the vegans and tree-huggers he knows I am sure of it(:

AS regards the former(aboveandPREVIOUSLY(:thaet is AGAIN::::the dilemma for FARHADI alone on this earth; he can sus this type of life out of the flux of it all when all an ACADEMIC CAN DO such as the present person you are reading IS::::open doors on the unexpectable. Personal-base-id/\ly - ALL FILM IS nazi; and ,so, the idea today thaet a film can inspire a culture like Before. did, seems like HITLERITE SHITTHE confluence of ordinary life-use of cinema then was co-orginary with the superflua(of LIVING a standard-issue LIFE which is like asking, today, whaet in the FUCKhappened to people:

THEY DECIDED what they register online is exemplary MORALITY and what thaet allows them to SIMULTANEOUSLY then ACT is a FAKE fuckin' LIFE(which even for HARVARD people is what amMounts to the most banal form of intelligence imagineable……..which is actually the original THESIS of this website which is thaet ITALL HAPPENS offline and off-the-screen.

SO:hopefully somewhere out there there is someone met someone in the 1990s punker lived a super-cool life(maybe just like in FIORE(2016).(: but, wheatever it is FOR FUCKin' SURE ain't is:on some NAZI!screen(and the reason HITLER thought cinema was trash for his movement of anti-jewish fuckery was thaet he KNEW IT NEVER amounts to anything for anyone BUT FUCKIN LOSERS)!/////.

Which is where I SIGN OUT and just conclude with this is an AESTHETIC art-form and there are myriad reasons to contemplate art-work not the least of which is to CRITICIZE the shit out the nazi stuff to get to what HITLER didn't realize was thaet it is COOL.to.HAVE. ART in your life-world which wraps up the train issue for the EUROPEAN UNION cause making trains faster and moreOMNI-present IS NOT A SOLUTION TO THIS ISSUE the facts are thaet no life-worlded system can possibly sustain a CINEMAticity-ical/life real-timeVERSIONING of itself(buuublining out in each and every instance to the ends of the earth a totally PRIVATUDINAL space on some reformulational SEMBLAGE-spacializationality wherewithalland within I take my version of even the train wherever and however I WANT and need it(which IS how these trash fuckin' EUROS think, like DELPY did at thaet time. ].